Chalkboards. Terracotta planters. Unglazed ceramics. These
are things that literally grate on my nerves, just as they make my back
teeth clench down on each other. I scowl when faced with these terrible items – the mere thought of having to touch any one of them makes me scrunch up my
face and swallow hard. These things repel me.
I had the exact same reaction when I read this
article, wherein American author, Jonathan Franzen, states his intense
dislike of E-readers, and his feelings that those who chose slumming with them
over the good ol’ paper variety of books are not ‘serious readers.’
Ouch.
My assumption (and yes, I have read his books), is that
Franzen considers himself an intellectual, and so must make intellectual
statements, including one stating that capitalists hate paperbacks (too
permanent), and that the obsolescence of books will make it very hard for the
world to work (!), as well as the idea that '… (that) kind of radical
contingency is not compatible with a system of justice or responsible
self-government.'
Jonathan Franzen is a luddite. And a goody two-shoes. What
kind of an author does not appreciate a bit of anarchy? Well, if I judge by his
books, one with no imagination.
Separately, I can handle such character flaws, but there has
to be something redeeming to make me still respect what that character has to
say. Hank Moody, for
example, is the perfect luddite. He types at a typewriter, listens to vinyl,
fears change and fucks hookers. That’s pretty old school. But he’s also clever,
and a hedonist, and is clearly no stranger to anarchy. He also knows how to
write a sex scene, something Franzen is woefully terrible at. Hank Moody is
redeemed. I know, he’s also fictional, which makes his transgressions even more
forgiveable.
Franzen, however, just sounds like a douchebag. I'm hoping this means that he is giving a significant portion, if not all, of the proceeds from the E-books he has sold to charity. He also
doesn’t seem to understand how E-readers work. He likes paper because it is
permanent and unalterable. Exactly how does one alter the text in an E-reader?
Let me know, because if it can be done, there are lots of books I’d like to
improve. I’ll start with Freedom.
I’ll admit that I was iffy on the subject of E-readers when
they first came out, worried that they would somehow dilute my experience as a
reader, or that I would be cheating on my beloved, full bookcase by downloading
to my Kobo. Of course, I was wrong, and any ‘serious’ reader knows that, in
this case (as in many others), so was Marshal McLuhan was wrong. The medium is
not the message. The essence, the importance, the beauty of a story is the
words, not the paper they are written on.
Seriously.
***


